"Non-binary" is itself a binary classification, and asserts a binary belief.
The moment you use a label, a nama-rupa- the very idea of using a label, is to introduce a binary split within entities that were previously grouped together, First, create a differentiation based on certain attributes and then use a label to mentally reinforce this partition.
Some related tweets on the skewering of logic.
in this context:
And talking of 'context', Ivy league woke humanities faculty may have taken a digested and utterly flawed version of Dharma ethics (that is always governed by Satya without ambiguity) and turned it into the antifragile ethics of moral relativism, in order to justify "friendly" calls for genocide.
"dharmic thought offers both universal and contextual poles – not just the latter, as that would be tantamount to moral relativism." - Rajiv Malhotra. Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism (2011).
On the lighter side, gender bias is not a bug but a feature of English:
Wokes oppose guns in the US that murder school kids but are comfortable with killing them in the womb to suit a lifestyle.
"Context".
A more useful and deeper multi-valued logic exists in the dharma systems of Bharata that go beyond the Aristotelian logic of the excluded middle, including the Buddhist Catuskoti and Jaina Syadavada. The solution to this mess also is in the harmony of dharma and not the divisiveness and hatred sown by the binary pair of Wokism and Abrahamic Fundamentalism.
